QUOTE (moldlady @ Feb 27 2008, 05:31 PM)

gfp,
I don't have a problem with your choices. But I don't want people to think that fungus is harmless.
That is the problem, its like saying animals are harmless. Obviously tigers and snakes are quite dangerous...and many animals have poisions which are toxic.
QUOTE
Plain and simple, there are 400 species of fungi that are pathogenic to man kind.
There are probably a LOT more, and many yet to be discovered but that still leaves hundreds of millions...
QUOTE
They live off of living things because they do not make their own food. That is why they are in their own special kingdom.
I still don't get it... do cows make their own food? Fish ? Chicken ... ?? They all live off other living things..
QUOTE
To continue to eat fungus or breathe it in can seriously disease an already compromised immune system. These fungi can start out as "harmless" and then morph into something that is harmful depending on the health of the organism.
The same can be said for many bacteria ... however the way you write this makes it sound like if you have a compromised immune system eating mushrooms will morph into something harmful. There are so many species of fungi that are as different and even more so than a elephant and a shrew ...
QUOTE
Any food that has been fermented or predigested by fungus will have mycotoxins imbedded in the organism. Use caution.
Do a google search "A.V. Constantini" and there will be a wealth of info. that I will not put people though. Discover the truth.
ML
Many of these mycotoxins are actually very useful which goes back to my original point. You seem to regard ALL fungi as bad... yet they have a natural place in the ecosystem.
The gut and colon are a micro-eco-system. Less is known about fungi than bacteria in the gut but little is known of the bacteria ... so that is not saying so much.
As with all eco-systems however evolution has provided the system that works... hence some fungi control harmful bacteria and some harmful bacteria control harmful fungi.
Obviously this isn't a perfect system... however it is well known that mammals without gut flora make less use of food and pass more harmful waste than those with.
The real problems tend to occur when we artificially remove part of an eco-system, be it in a single gut or a forest.
Removing all fungi will allow proliferation of types of bacteria, removing all bacteria proliferation of certain fungi.
Our understanding of the relationships is so poor that about the only thing we can say for certain is messing about with the balance will usually have adverse effects.
We obviously need to avoid the 400 or so species which are known to be pathogenic but removing
all fungi is more likely to have a detrimental effect even if we could.
The reality though is if you eat, breath and live in the fresh air then you are going to be breathing in fungi spores and bacteria. Obviously we want to avoid those with pathogenic effects, be it bacteria spores like anthrax or fungal spores like candida but since many non-harmful fungi actively kill off those with pathogenic effects cutting them all out artificially is only making a problem that didn't already exist.